[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC6DD4D.1010008@calvaedi.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:33:49 +0100
From: John Hughes <john@...vaedi.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
CC: Jim Rees <rees@...ch.edu>, John Hughes <john@...va.COM>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add "-e" option to rpc.gssd to allow error on ticket
expiry. Try 2 with added man pages.
On 11/18/2011 10:03 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:57 -0500, Jim Rees wrote:
>
>>
>> The write() syscall doesn't indicate whether the data is safe or not. That
>> would be the close() syscall.
>>
> fsync(). Which may succeed if the user renews their ticket first.
> However you may still have data loss if dirty data has been lost because
> of EKEYEXPIRED returns on the WRITE RPC call...
>
Only if the write(2) returned EKEYEXPIRED, surely,
> Also, for the fsync() to return EKEYEXPIRED _after_ the user has renewed
> their ticket would seem counter-intuitive to most people.
>
I would want to know if data was lost.
Intuition means nothing if I get an error.
If it were possible I'd like:
1. write works
1a. WRITE RPC fails, data stays in cache
2. ticket renewed
3. fsync works, data written
But:
1. write...
1a. WRITE RPC fails
1b. ... fails
seems ok.
Even
1. write works
1a WRITE RPC fails
2. ticket renewed
3. fsync fails
would be ok for me. (light cone problems?)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists