[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC7LmnuWLA1LFQa-Vg4StOryo_wd1KjwaQ7m+Yb8Nhek7f=Qjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 07:25:09 -0200
From: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@...onov.net>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: By default, enable RC6 on IVB and SNB when reasonable
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 04:41, Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com> wrote:
>
> +static bool intel_enable_rc6(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + if (i915_enable_rc6 >= 0)
> + return i915_enable_rc6;
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 7)
> + return 1;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
> + /*
> + * Only enable RC6 if all dma remapping is disabled, or if
> + * there's no iommu present in the machine.
> + */
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 6)
> + return no_iommu || dmar_disabled;
> +#endif
> + return 0;
> +}
Just one question I caught on 2nd read. Shouldn't we have #else within
this #ifdef block, to return 1? Otherwise, if CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU is
not defined, we'll always disable rc6.
Or we just always intend to disable rc6 in case CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU is not there?
--
Eugeni Dodonov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists