[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111120013621.GA2248@krava.redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:36:21 -0500
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf tool: Initialize events IDs in a single function
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:22:55PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 02:46:42PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > Currently events' IDs initialization is scattered among the
> > code. Adding function 'perf_evlist__init_ids' to allocate
> > and retrive events' IDs in one place.
>
> I'm ok with this one, will merge it in my perf/core branch together with
> a fix for a bug I noticed in the original code and that remains with
> your changes: consider what happens if we do a second perf_evlist__mmap,
> we will call perf_evlist__id_add_fd again and thus bump evsel->ids++
> over nr_threads * nr_cpus, overflowing it.
is there a valid scenario for this function to be called more than once?
I'd think that just ensuring this is called once is enough
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists