[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC8EECB.7070706@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:12:59 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: optimize memslots searching
On 11/20/2011 01:29 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 11:16 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > This is the more work base on my v1 patchset which is posted some months ago,
> > it can be found at:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/22/68
> >
> > Change log:
> > - sort memslots base on its size and do the line search instead of binary
> > search base on gfn, it is from Avi's idea.
> > - in order to reduce cache footprint, memslots are sorted in the array of
> > kvm->memslots->memslots[] and introduce a table to map slot id to index in
> > the array
> >
> > There is the performance result:
> >
> > autotest for RHEL.6.1 setup/boot/reboot/shutdown(average):
> > ept=1: before: 449.5 after: 447.8
> > ept=0: before: 532.7 after: 529.8
> >
> > kernbench(average):
> > ept=1: before: 127.94 after: 126.98
> > ept=0: before: 196.85 after: 189.66
>
> Looks good, had a couple of comments but they're really minor.
>
btw, this patchset touches a lot of common code. Did you crossbuild for
other kvm archs?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists