[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1321870915.2552.22.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:21:55 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 3.2-rc2: BUG kmalloc-8: Redzone overwritten
Le lundi 21 novembre 2011 à 11:15 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>
> Hmm, trinity tries to crash decnet ;)
>
> Maybe we should remove this decnet stuff for good instead of tracking
> all bugs just for the record. Is there anybody still using decnet ?
>
> For example dn_start_slow_timer() starts a timer without holding a
> reference on struct sock, this is highly suspect.
>
> [PATCH] decnet: proper socket refcounting
>
> Better use sk_reset_timer() / sk_stop_timer() helpers to make sure we
> dont access already freed/reused memory later.
>
> Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Hmm, I forgot to remove the sock_hold(sk) call from dn_slow_timer(),
here is V2 :
[PATCH] decnet: proper socket refcounting
Better use sk_reset_timer() / sk_stop_timer() helpers to make sure we
dont access already freed/reused memory later.
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
V2: remove sock_hold(sk) call from dn_slow_timer()
net/decnet/dn_timer.c | 17 +++++------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_timer.c b/net/decnet/dn_timer.c
index 67f691b..d9c150c 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_timer.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_timer.c
@@ -36,16 +36,13 @@ static void dn_slow_timer(unsigned long arg);
void dn_start_slow_timer(struct sock *sk)
{
- sk->sk_timer.expires = jiffies + SLOW_INTERVAL;
- sk->sk_timer.function = dn_slow_timer;
- sk->sk_timer.data = (unsigned long)sk;
-
- add_timer(&sk->sk_timer);
+ setup_timer(&sk->sk_timer, dn_slow_timer, (unsigned long)sk);
+ sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, jiffies + SLOW_INTERVAL);
}
void dn_stop_slow_timer(struct sock *sk)
{
- del_timer(&sk->sk_timer);
+ sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer);
}
static void dn_slow_timer(unsigned long arg)
@@ -53,12 +50,10 @@ static void dn_slow_timer(unsigned long arg)
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)arg;
struct dn_scp *scp = DN_SK(sk);
- sock_hold(sk);
bh_lock_sock(sk);
if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
- sk->sk_timer.expires = jiffies + HZ / 10;
- add_timer(&sk->sk_timer);
+ sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, jiffies + HZ / 10);
goto out;
}
@@ -100,9 +95,7 @@ static void dn_slow_timer(unsigned long arg)
scp->keepalive_fxn(sk);
}
- sk->sk_timer.expires = jiffies + SLOW_INTERVAL;
-
- add_timer(&sk->sk_timer);
+ sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, jiffies + SLOW_INTERVAL);
out:
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
sock_put(sk);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists