[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfGthSxanFbL2vKCpOQbP9K5oNAxeaYt7OMdmdoCb4eLQ_Fww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:58:46 +0100
From: Xander Hover <lkml@...er.be>
To: peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: softirq oops from b44_poll
Hi all,
I noticed the small discussion about the b44_poll OOPS and
I also have a uni-processor PC with a broadcom network device (b44)
that causes similar kernel OOPSes.
Here is a (reproducible) trace that still shows up in kernel 3.1.1:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:159 local_bh_enable+0x32/0x79()
Hardware name: Dimension 2400
Modules linked in: snd_seq_midi snd_emu10k1_synth snd_emux_synth
snd_seq_virmidi snd_seq_midi_emul snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event
snd_seq snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss bnep rfcomm cryptd aes_i586
aes_generic ecb btusb bluetooth rfkill ppdev snd_emu10k1 snd_rawmidi
snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_pcm snd_seq_device snd_timer
snd_page_alloc dcdbas snd_util_mem parport_pc snd_hwdep snd parport
emu10k1_gp rtc_cmos gameport i2c_i801
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.1.1-gentoo #1
Call Trace:
[<c1022970>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7a
[<c102699e>] ? local_bh_enable+0x32/0x79
[<c1022994>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x13
[<c102699e>] local_bh_enable+0x32/0x79
[<c134bfd8>] destroy_conntrack+0x7c/0x9b
[<c134890b>] nf_conntrack_destroy+0x1f/0x26
[<c132e3a6>] skb_release_head_state+0x74/0x83
[<c132e286>] __kfree_skb+0xb/0x6b
[<c132e30a>] consume_skb+0x24/0x26
[<c127c925>] b44_poll+0xaa/0x449
[<c1333ca1>] net_rx_action+0x3f/0xea
[<c1026a44>] __do_softirq+0x5f/0xd5
[<c10269e5>] ? local_bh_enable+0x79/0x79
<IRQ> [<c1026c32>] ? irq_exit+0x34/0x8d
[<c1003628>] ? do_IRQ+0x74/0x87
[<c13f5329>] ? common_interrupt+0x29/0x30
[<c1006e18>] ? default_idle+0x29/0x3e
[<c10015a7>] ? cpu_idle+0x2f/0x5d
[<c13e91c5>] ? rest_init+0x79/0x7b
[<c15c66a9>] ? start_kernel+0x297/0x29c
[<c15c60b0>] ? i386_start_kernel+0xb0/0xb7
---[ end trace 583f33bb1aa207a9 ]---
However if I apply the following patch this error does not show up anymore:
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/b44.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/b44.c
index 4cf835d..3fb66d0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/b44.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/b44.c
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static void b44_tx(struct b44 *bp)
skb->len,
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
rp->skb = NULL;
- dev_kfree_skb(skb);
+ dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
}
bp->tx_cons = cons;
--
1.7.8.rc3
This is a "works for me..", however it may very well be that this only
suppresses the symptoms instead of solving the root cause.
I got this idea from a previous patch (see commit log below) which did
the exact opposite from this patch.
--------------
commit 4924f44b97a034dbf44c14b709b0b0907ee23f04
Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon Jul 4 17:57:10 2011 -0700
b44: use dev_kfree_skb() in b44_tx()
b44_tx() is run from softirq handler, it can use dev_kfree_skb() instead
of dev_kfree_skb_irq()
--------------
Any thoughts?
Kind regards,
Xander Hover
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists