[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC9C695.3060907@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:33:41 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: introduce kvm_for_each_memslot macro
On 11/20/2011 07:21 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 11:18 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> index bb8728e..10524c0 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -307,6 +307,10 @@ static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, int i)
>> (vcpup = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, idx)) != NULL; \
>> idx++)
>>
>> +#define kvm_for_each_memslot(slots, memslot, i) \
>> + for (i = 0; i < (slots)->nmemslots && \
>> + ({ memslot = &(slots)->memslots[i]; 1; }); i++)
>> +
>>
>
> Statement expression not needed, you can use the comma operator:
>
> i < (slots)->nmemslots && (memslot = @(slots)->memslots[i], true)
>
> or even
>
> memslot = &(slots)->memslots[i], i < (slots)->nmemslots
>
> or just kill i and make memslot the loop variable.
>
Good, will fix it in the next version, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists