[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ECA7760.5060603@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:08:00 -0500
From: William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>
To: Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, mingo@...e.hu,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] perf: x86 RDPMC and RDTSC support
On 11/21/2011 10:02 AM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> These few patches implement x86 RDPMC support and add an extention to the self
>> monitoring data to also allow additional time updates using userspace TSC reads.
>>
>> There's a few loose ends, but it mostly seems to work.
>
> I'll have to test these out.
>
> I have some low-level benchmarks I've been working on, you can see some
> preliminary results here:
> http://web.eecs.utk.edu/~vweaver1/projects/perf-events/benchmarks/
>
> perf_events was lagging behind perfmon2 and perfctr in self-monitoring
> overhead, but maybe these changes will help that.
>
> perf_event overhead got a lot worse between 2.6.32 and 3.0, I'm mid-bisect
> on that trying to isolate the cause.
>
> Vince
>
Hi Vince,
Any improvements in performance of self-monitoring would be welcomed. International Symposium on computer Architecture (ISCA 2011) has paper about a low overhead mechanism to read out the performance counters, LiMiT (http://castl.cs.columbia.edu/limit/index.php/LiMiT) that avoids using system calls to read the performance counter data. That paper shows a fair amount of overhead for PAPI.
-Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists