[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC9D175.2070008@st.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:50:05 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
To: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Cc: Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@...com>,
Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@...com>,
Vipin KUMAR <vipin.kumar@...com>,
Rajeev KUMAR <rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com>,
Deepak SIKRI <deepak.sikri@...com>,
Vipul Kumar SAMAR <vipulkumar.samar@...com>,
Amit VIRDI <Amit.VIRDI@...com>,
Pratyush ANAND <pratyush.anand@...com>,
Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@...com>,
"viresh.linux@...il.com" <viresh.linux@...il.com>,
Bhavna YADAV <bhavna.yadav@...com>,
Vincenzo FRASCINO <Vincenzo.FRASCINO@...com>,
Mirko GARDI <mirko.gardi@...com>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] gpio/gpio-stmpe: ADD support for stmpe variant
801
On 11/18/2011 5:29 PM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:02, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
>> index 4c980b5..000b019 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
>> @@ -65,7 +65,15 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int val)
>> + if (!val && (stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPSR_LSB] ==
>> + stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPCR_LSB]))
>> + stmpe_set_bits(stmpe, reg, mask, ~mask);
>> + else
>> + stmpe_set_bits(stmpe, reg, mask, mask);
>> }
>
> This code,
>
> (1) for 801, when clearing one GPIO, sets all the others.
I assumed stmpe_set_bits will only affect bits which are 1
in mask and i was wrong. :(
> (2) for other devices, adds an an unnecessary read (within stmpe_set_bits()),
> which wasn't there before.
>
Correct.
> Please rework to something like:
>
> if (stmpe->regs[...)
> stmpe_set_bits(stmpe, reg, mask, val ? mask : 0);
> else
> stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, reg, mask);
>
Sure.
>>
>> static int stmpe_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>> @@ -125,10 +133,19 @@ static struct gpio_chip template_chip = {
>> static int stmpe_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>> {
>> struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> + struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
>> int offset = d->irq - stmpe_gpio->irq_base;
>> int regoffset = offset / 8;
>> int mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>>
>> + /* STMPE801 doesn't have RE and FE registers */
>> + if (stmpe->partnum == STMPE801) {
>> + if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)
>> + return 0;
>
> This looks wrong. From the datasheet I see that it supports edges only,
> so perhaps you meant to say IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_* above.
>
I meant to say IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL* only, but i was wrong. I didn't read the manual
correctly. :(
> In that case please reorganize this to add the return 0 after the
> existing check which excludes levels (below).
>
Sure
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists