[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111121073101.6b369421.hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:31:01 +0200
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: iommu: tegra: Add initial Tegra IOMMU driver
Hi Joerg,
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:43:54 +0100
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 07:19:53PM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
>
> > I found that those patches are not IOMMU API implementations.
> > I wonder why they need to be located in drivers/iommu?
>
> The current effort goes into creating a generic framework for IOMMUs.
> These patches create their own framework which is totally the wrong
> direction, they even implement their own version of an IOMMU-API.
>
> I object against merging them until they are converted to the generic
> IOMMU-API.
Ok, I'll in v2 of this patchset.
That was a plan, mentioned in the cover letter of this patchset.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists