[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111121220519.GO25776@google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:05:19 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: paul@...lmenage.org, rjw@...k.pl, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, matthltc@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] cgroup: always lock threadgroup during migration
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:52:43PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:46:34PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > I have the feeling the task_lock is now useless given that we are synchronized
> > against cgroup_exit() with the threadgroup_lock.
> >
> > It's probably also useless in cgroup_exit(). But that's something for a further
> > patch...
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Oops, I missed what Kamezawa said and your answer, sorry.
Yeap, I'll see how removing it for put looks.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists