[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111121072931.GA1625@x4.trippels.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:29:31 +0100
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:3357, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413
On 2011.11.21 at 08:44 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 20:02 +0800, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2011.11.18 at 09:54 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2011.11.18 at 16:43 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The dirty flag comes from a bunch of unrelated xfs patches from Christoph, that
> > > > > > I'm testing right now.
> > > >
> > > > Where is the xfs patchset? I am wondering if it is due to slub code.
> >
> > I begin to wonder if this might be the result of a compiler bug.
> > The kernel in question was compiled with gcc version 4.7.0 20111117. And
> > there was commit to the gcc repository today that looks suspicious:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=181466
> >
>
> Tell us if it is still there and you can reproduce it.
The issue wasn't easily reproducible in the first place. I will build my
kernels with a more stable gcc version for the next days and see if I
can still reproduce the problem. (It didn't show up in the last few days
of testing).
--
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists