[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111121215918.febd9fd4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:59:18 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:19:24 +0530 "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Subject : khugepaged blocks suspend2ram (3.2.0-rc1-00252-g8f042aa)
> > Submitter : Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>
> > Date : 2011-11-12 10:48
> > Message-ID : 20111112104859.7744b282@...home
> > References : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/12/11
> >
>
> Andrea's patch already fixes this issue, which was reported first by
> Jiri Slaby. https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/11/93
> I remember Andrew Morton taking this patch in his -mm tree. But it is
> not in mainline yet. So can we consider this closed or not?
grr, nothing in that patch's changelog indicates that it fixed a
regression nor that it fixed an infinite blockage of suspend.
I moved it to my 3.2 queue, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists