[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111122122206.GD8397@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:22:06 +0100
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 09:59:18PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> grr, nothing in that patch's changelog indicates that it fixed a
> regression nor that it fixed an infinite blockage of suspend.
Well it's not a recent thing so I didn't flag it as a regression. It
doesn't infinite block it, suspend works fine almost all the time (or
it would have been noticed before), and if you've bad luck and it
doesn't suspend the first time around like someone experienced, if you
try again a bit later it'll work.
> I moved it to my 3.2 queue, thanks.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists