linux-kernel - [49/53] xfs: Fix possible memory corruption in xfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111123002409.195639830@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:23:56 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, xfs@....sgi.com,
	Alex Elder <aelder@....com>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>
Subject: [49/53] xfs: Fix possible memory corruption in xfs_readlink

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>

commit b52a360b2aa1c59ba9970fb0f52bbb093fcc7a24 upstream.

Fixes a possible memory corruption when the link is larger than
MAXPATHLEN and XFS_DEBUG is not enabled. This also remove the
S_ISLNK assert, since the inode mode is checked previously in
xfs_readlink_by_handle() and via VFS.

Updated to address concerns raised by Ben Hutchings about the loose
attention paid to 32- vs 64-bit values, and the lack of handling a
potentially negative pathlen value:
 - Changed type of "pathlen" to be xfs_fsize_t, to match that of
   ip->i_d.di_size
 - Added checking for a negative pathlen to the too-long pathlen
   test, and generalized the message that gets reported in that case
   to reflect the change
As a result, if a negative pathlen were encountered, this function
would return EFSCORRUPTED (and would fail an assertion for a debug
build)--just as would a too-long pathlen.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@....com>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c |   14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ xfs_readlink(
 	char		*link)
 {
 	xfs_mount_t	*mp = ip->i_mount;
-	int		pathlen;
+	xfs_fsize_t	pathlen;
 	int		error = 0;
 
 	trace_xfs_readlink(ip);
@@ -545,13 +545,19 @@ xfs_readlink(
 
 	xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
 
-	ASSERT((ip->i_d.di_mode & S_IFMT) == S_IFLNK);
-	ASSERT(ip->i_d.di_size <= MAXPATHLEN);
-
 	pathlen = ip->i_d.di_size;
 	if (!pathlen)
 		goto out;
 
+	if (pathlen < 0 || pathlen > MAXPATHLEN) {
+		xfs_alert(mp, "%s: inode (%llu) bad symlink length (%lld)",
+			 __func__, (unsigned long long) ip->i_ino,
+			 (long long) pathlen);
+		ASSERT(0);
+		return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED);
+	}
+
+
 	if (ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFINLINE) {
 		memcpy(link, ip->i_df.if_u1.if_data, pathlen);
 		link[pathlen] = '\0';


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/