linux-kernel - Re: Kernelpanic on eeePC and MSI Wind (both using rt2800pci) with Linux 3.x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ECC512D.2010002@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:49:33 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	michael@...ha-unix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernelpanic on eeePC and MSI Wind (both using rt2800pci) with
 Linux 3.x

On 11/22/2011 02:55 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Michael Basse<michael@...ha-unix.de>
> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:49:49 +0100
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> just for the record. This thread is hopefully providing a patch
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/80759
>>
>> already built the kernel and doing some testing now.
>
> That patch is wrong, it returns IRQ_HANDLED when it can't tell if the
> chip generated the interrupt or not.
>
> Therefore, if any other device shares that interrupt line it's
> interrupts can be lost when this case triggers.
>
> This has to be fixed another way.

Huh? IRQ_HANDLED is the "safe" return value when you don't know for sure 
whether your device generated the interrupt. Returning that doesn't 
prevent other handlers on the same IRQ from being called.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/