[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ECC555D.4080902@mips.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:07:25 +0800
From: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dczhu@...s.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the mips tree
On 11/23/2011 10:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c between commit f40c522a4216
> ("MIPS/Perf-events: Remove erroneous check on active_events") and
> c481e48d9478 ("MIPS/Perf-events: Remove pmu and event state checking in
> validate_event()") from the mips tree and commit aa2bc1ade590 ("perf:
> Don't use -ENOSPC for out of PMU resources") from the tip tree.
>
> Just context changes (and one hunk was removed). I fixed it up (see
> below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Yes, I was aware of this conflict while writing that patch series based
on linux-mips tree. Your changes look good to me. Thanks for the fixup!
Deng-Cheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists