linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the mips tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:07:25 +0800
From:	Deng-Cheng Zhu <dczhu@...s.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the mips tree

On 11/23/2011 10:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c between commit f40c522a4216
> ("MIPS/Perf-events: Remove erroneous check on active_events") and
> c481e48d9478 ("MIPS/Perf-events: Remove pmu and event state checking in
> validate_event()") from the mips tree and commit aa2bc1ade590 ("perf:
> Don't use -ENOSPC for out of PMU resources") from the tip tree.
>
> Just context changes (and one hunk was removed).  I fixed it up (see
> below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Yes, I was aware of this conflict while writing that patch series based
on linux-mips tree. Your changes look good to me. Thanks for the fixup!


Deng-Cheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/