[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111123084932.GF22734@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:49:33 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 RFC] virtio-pci: flexible configuration layout
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 01:02:22PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> +/* Fields in VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_COMMON_CFG: */
> +struct virtio_pci_common_cfg {
> + /* About the whole device. */
> + __u64 device_features; /* read-only */
> + __u64 guest_features; /* read-write */
We currently require atomic accesses to common fields.
Some architectures might not have such for 64 bit,
so these need to be split I think ...
> + __u64 queue_address; /* read-write */
> + __u16 msix_config; /* read-write */
> + __u8 device_status; /* read-write */
> + __u8 unused;
> +
> + /* About a specific virtqueue. */
> + __u16 queue_select; /* read-write */
> + __u16 queue_align; /* read-write, power of 2. */
> + __u16 queue_size; /* read-write, power of 2. */
> + __u16 queue_msix_vector;/* read-write */
> +};
> #endif
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists