[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111123104926.GB4063@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:49:26 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Marc Vertes <marc.vertes@...fox.com>
Cc: broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, wim@...ana.be,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
HaraldWelte@...tech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] watchdog: add a new driver for VIA chipsets
(BTW I removed a few duplicates from the CC list)
> A question regarding "nowayout", in the case of this VIA chipset where
> a watchdog can not be stopped once started from BIOS. I think I should
> set unconditionally WDOG_NO_WAY_OUT in status, shouldn't I ?
>
> I also do not think it is correct to implement a timer and ping
> proactively in case of magicclose because 1) it complicates a bit the
> code, 2) there is no way to know the timeout value, and it set very low
> in the BIOS (1 s).
Yup, I'd accept the reason that you can't know the timeout value and
then setting NO_WAY_OUT unconditionally looks like the thing to do here.
@Wim: Would you accept drivers which can only ping a watchdog but
neither start/stop it?
@Marc: If he does, would you be interested in updating the watchdog-core
so that no start()/stop() will also be accepted if there is a ping()?
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists