[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322049330.14799.43.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:55:30 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/7] sched: convert rq->avg_idle to rq->avg_event
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 15:22 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> We update rq->clock only at points of interest to the scheduler.
> Using this distance has the same effect as measuring idle time
> for idle_balance() throttling, and allows other uses as well.
I'm not sure I follow, suppose we're happily context switching away, how
is the avg distance between context switches related to idle time?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists