[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111123173313.GB29639@google.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:33:13 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] trace_events_filter: use rcu_assign_pointer() when
setting ftrace_event_call->filter
Hello, Steven.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:06:40PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > So, synchronized_sched() being called after isn't relevant. We want
> > smp_wmb() between data structure initialization and assignment of the
> > new pointer.
>
> Ah, you're saying that we need to guarantee that the allocated filter is
> seen before we update the call->filter to point to it. OK, fair enough,
> this does look like a bug fix.
>
> Is it big enough to be considered for stable?
It's unlikely to happen for x86 or arm and that probably is the
biggest reason there hasn't already been a bug report. It isn't very
urgent but at the same time the change is almost trivial, so marking
it for stable is a pretty safe bet. I lean toward marking it for
stable but the leaning isn't too strong. :)
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists