[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111123180651.GB19739@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:06:51 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, eric.miao@...aro.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, jeremy.kerr@...onical.com,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>, sboyd@...cinc.com,
magnus.damm@...il.com, dsaxena@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arnd.bergmann@...aro.org,
patches@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
richard.zhao@...aro.org, shawn.guo@...escale.com, paul@...an.com,
linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
skannan@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] clk: export tree topology and clk data via sysfs
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:59:04AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> ..let's plan on getting rid of the early usage of clocks instead so
> you don't have the issue of deferring stuff.
No - we have too many platforms already using them early to do a change
like this - and to do such a change will force them to invent some other
way. That's just stupid.
Keep the clk API as a fundamental thing which should be initialized early
so we don't have to invent new clk APIs to get around its unavailability.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists