linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Device tree support for regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111123190114.GB17587@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:01:14 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
Cc:	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, robherring2@...il.com,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, tony@...mide.com, lrg@...com,
	b-cousson@...com, patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	shawn.guo@...escale.com, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	olof@...om.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Device tree support for regulators

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:47:16PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

> For the first 2 patches (1/4 and 2/4) I have dropped
> Acks from Mark, since they have changed to some extent
> from the last post and retained the Acks recieved on the
> last 2 patches (3/4 and 4/4) as they remain unchanged.

Looks good and nobody complained yet so I've dropped this into -next to
get it a bit of exposure.  I'm reasonably happy that the DT people have
already had a good chance to look at this stuff on previous iterations.
Unless there's any major changes or we need to back it out later on
for some other reason please send incremental patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/