[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1111231107430.2226@sister.anvils>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:16:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
cc: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: wire up .truncate_range and .fallocate
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> It also seems like all fallocate implementaions for far got away
> without the unmap_mapping_range, so either people didn't test them
> hard enough, or tmpfs doesn't need it either. I fear the former
> is true.
They're saved by the funny little one-by-one unmap_mapping_range()
fallback in truncate_inode_page(). It's inefficient (in those rare
cases when someone is punching a hole somewhere that's mapped) and
we ought to do better, but we don't have an actual bug there.
Hugh
int truncate_inode_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
{
if (page_mapped(page)) {
unmap_mapping_range(mapping,
(loff_t)page->index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT,
PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, 0);
}
return truncate_complete_page(mapping, page);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists