linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] cdc-acm: Fix potential deadlock (lockdep warning)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ECD6198.20309@suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:11:52 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...gle.com>
CC:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] cdc-acm: Fix potential deadlock (lockdep warning)

On 11/23/2011 10:08 PM, Havard Skinnemoen wrote:
> tty_port_close_start() takes port->lock, so if we try to do that,
> we'll turn a potential deadlock into a real one. Or did you mean
> something else?

I mean the other uses of port->count in your driver.

> I think I'll try to follow Alan's advice and use tty_port_close()
> instead of the split functions.

Yes, that's indeed the best approach. However you have to use them all:
tty_port_open, tty_port_hangup, tty_port_close. OR you would have to do
the locking of count properly.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/