[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ECD67C7.3010702@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:38:15 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: gdfuego@...il.com, richard.weinberger@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Finding a hidden bound TCP socket
On 11/23/2011 01:01 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "G. D. Fuego"<gdfuego@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:27:33 -0500
>
>> Any comments? The behavior seems broken. At the very least its very
>> inconsistent with other Unixes.
>
> Until the socket has a full final tuple it is bound to, there is no
> reason to list it.
>
> No UNIX lists a socket which is partially bound and hasn't either
> performed a listen() or a connect().
Well.... I took the .c file mentioned previously, and compiled it on a
Solaris 10 8/11 instance. The 25-odd sockets it created *were* listed
in the output of netstat -an -- local address as *.<portnum> remote
address as *.* and a state of "BOUND."
A FreeBSD (rev 8 IIRC) netstat -an seems to display them in a state of
"CLOSED." I didn't check HP-UX 11i v3 or AIX 6.
rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists