[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111123002408.725504127@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:23:51 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, xfs@....sgi.com,
Alex Elder <aelder@....com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: [44/53] xfs: fix xfs_mark_inode_dirty during umount
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
commit 866e4ed77448a0c311e1b055eb72ea05423fd799 upstream.
During umount we do not add a dirty inode to the lru and wait for it to
become clean first, but force writeback of data and metadata with
I_WILL_FREE set. Currently there is no way for XFS to detect that the
inode has been redirtied for metadata operations, as we skip the
mark_inode_dirty call during teardown. Fix this by setting i_update_core
nanually in that case, so that the inode gets flushed during inode reclaim.
Alternatively we could enable calling mark_inode_dirty for inodes in
I_WILL_FREE state, and let the VFS dirty tracking handle this. I decided
against this as we will get better I/O patterns from reclaim compared to
the synchronous writeout in write_inode_now, and always marking the inode
dirty in some way from xfs_mark_inode_dirty is a better safetly net in
either case.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c
@@ -69,9 +69,8 @@ xfs_synchronize_times(
}
/*
- * If the linux inode is valid, mark it dirty.
- * Used when committing a dirty inode into a transaction so that
- * the inode will get written back by the linux code
+ * If the linux inode is valid, mark it dirty, else mark the dirty state
+ * in the XFS inode to make sure we pick it up when reclaiming the inode.
*/
void
xfs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(
@@ -81,6 +80,10 @@ xfs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(
if (!(inode->i_state & (I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING)))
mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
+ else {
+ barrier();
+ ip->i_update_core = 1;
+ }
}
void
@@ -91,6 +94,11 @@ xfs_mark_inode_dirty(
if (!(inode->i_state & (I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING)))
mark_inode_dirty(inode);
+ else {
+ barrier();
+ ip->i_update_core = 1;
+ }
+
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists