[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111124183248.GV3366@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:32:48 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marcus Osdoba <marcus.osdoba@...glemail.com>,
649216@...s.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] topology: Provide CPU topology in sysfs in !SMP
configurations
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:24:26AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 07:04:39AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not
> > very interesting. The current code appears to work properly for !SMP
> > (tested on i386).
>
> Why, what will the topology look like for this?
physical_package_id: "-1"
core_id: "0"
thread_siblings: "1"
thread_siblings_list: "0"
core_siblings: "1"
core_siblings_list: "0"
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists