[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111124064853.GA28065@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:18:53 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
tulasidhard@...il.com, Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: uprobes: register/unregister probes.
>
> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 16:37 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > +#define UPROBES_HASH_SZ 13
> > +/* serialize (un)register */
> > +static struct mutex uprobes_mutex[UPROBES_HASH_SZ];
> > +#define uprobes_hash(v) (&uprobes_mutex[((unsigned long)(v)) %\
> > + UPROBES_HASH_SZ])
>
> Was there any reason to for using this hasing scheme, say over hash.h?
There is no specific reason for choosing this hashing scheme over the
current. I just say ext4_aio_mutex in fs/ext4/ext4.h and did something
similar.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists