[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3F607A5180246847A760FD34122A1E052DC61F@039-SN1MPN1-003.039d.mgd.msft.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:49:03 +0000
From: Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@...escale.com>
To: "dedekind1@...il.com" <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Liu Shuo-B35362 <B35362@...escale.com>
CC: "dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com" <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>,
Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@...escale.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support
large-page Nand chip
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support
> large-page Nand chip
>
> On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 08:41 +0800, b35362@...escale.com wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * Freescale FCM controller has a 2K size limitation of buffer
> > + * RAM, so elbc_fcm_ctrl->buffer have to be used if writesize
> > + * of chip is greater than 2048.
> > + * We malloc a large enough buffer (maximum page size is
> 16K).
> > + */
> > + elbc_fcm_ctrl->buffer = kmalloc(1024 * 16 + 1024,
> GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Are there NANDs with 16KiB page size?
We are not sure, but are there possibility that chip with 16K page will appear? Or maybe we can add a MACRO for the maximum page size?
- Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists