[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86sjlccchg.fsf@sumi.keithp.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:56:27 -0800
From: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
To: Patrik Kullman <patrik.kullman@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: i915: 3.2 rc1/2 KMS regression
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:29:31 +0100, Patrik Kullman <patrik.kullman@...il.com> wrote:
> Ok, so I've now bisected, and it turns out that
> dc22ee6fc18ce0f15424e753e8473c306ece95c1 is the first bad revision.
>
> Would it be safe to checkout 3.2-rc3 and git revert
> dc22ee6fc18ce0f15424e753e8473c306ece95c1 (to test that it's the only
> bad commit) ?
Yes, that would be very useful. Please send kernel logs with drm.debug=4
for an older working kernel, a broken kernel and a patched
kernel with this commit reverted.
--
keith.packard@...el.com
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists