[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111125233436.GA19161@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 03:34:36 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Cc: 최종환 <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] max8997_charger: Remove duplicate module.h
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:26:41AM +0000, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> Sender : 최종환<jhbird.choi@...sung.com> S4(선임)/선임/S/W Solution개발팀(S.LSI)/삼성전자
> Date : 2011-11-23 13:40 (GMT+09:00)
> Title : [PATCH] max8997_charger: Remove duplicate module.h
> >
> > From: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
> >
> > module.h was included twice.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
>
> Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
The issue introduced in post-3.1 kernels, and since I don't want
to send it to Linus now (as it is not a regression fix), nor I want
to pull -rc kernels into battery GIT tree, I'll just let the patch
sit for awhile till 3.2 released. And during merge window I'll apply
it, just before sending pull request.
That is, I noticed the patch, it looks OK, and I'll apply it. Just
not now.
Thanks!
p.s.
The other option you have is to send the patch via -trivial tree.
I'm fine either way.
--
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists