linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111125103011.18e167cd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:30:11 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rob Clark <rob.clark@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree

> Ping?

As I said last time you asked this - the correct merge resolution is to
pull the DRM updates and mark the staging GMA500 Kconfig "&& BROKEN". The
staging driver is frozen while we merge outside of staging and will not
be getting any attention at this point - changes there just mess up the
move work which is far more important.

Also nothing in staging should be allowed to hold up real work. The
resolution for anything in staging blocking merges is to mark the staging
parts && BROKEN IMHO

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/