lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:24:56 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Pedro Alves <pedro@...esourcery.com>
Cc:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] fork: Add the ability to create tasks
	with?given pids

On 11/25, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> From the perspective of a client that is
> going to use this on a live system, CLONE_CHILD_USEPIDS seems a little better,
> in that the pid race is only against another task reusing the same pid,

Yes. Except you can't use on a live system at all. It simply doesn't
work after the first "normal" clone() without CLONE_CHILD_USEPIDS.

Although we can probably allow CLONE_CHILD_USEPIDS for CAP_SYS_ADMIN.

> while with setting last_pid, you have a try/whoops-not-the-pid-I-want/kill/retry/rinse/repeat/
> loop racing against all fork/clone's in the system,

Yes, setting last_pid can race with another fork(). I agree this
sucks. But simple ;)

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ