linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Nov 2011 04:32:26 +0100
From:	Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues

After dpll1 reprogramming has been moved from setup_arch() to
kernel_init(), I've been observing several issues, resulting in
undesired system behaviour on my Amstrad Delta. This series fixes
those issues.

Janusz Krzysztofik (5):
  ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 default rate reprogramming method
  ARM: OMAP1: Fix ckctl value used for dpll1 defualt rate
  ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming not actually allowed
  init/calibrate.c: allow for recalibration of loops per jiffy
  ARM: OMAP1: recalibrate loops per jiffy after dpll1 reprogram

 arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c      |   10 +---------
 arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c |    9 +++++++--
 arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c        |    3 +++
 include/linux/delay.h            |    4 +++-
 init/calibrate.c                 |    6 ++++--
 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/