linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cgroup tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:33:44 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cgroup tree

Hello,

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:50:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I don't know how to fix this up (the obvious fix will cause us to have
> nested rcu_read_lock()s and I have no idea if that is allowed).  Can you
> please provide me with a merge resolution?   I am also wondering why such
> closely related work is happening in 2 different trees.

Sorry about all the conflicts.  There have been major updates to both
freezer and cgroup and cgroup_freezer happens to receive changes from
both subsystem changes.  I dropped cgroup changes for now as Linus
doesn't seem to be too happy with the current approach.  Once an
agreeable approach is found, I'll pull in pm-freezer branch into
cgroup and then put cgroup changes on top of them.  That should remove
most of merging headaches.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/