[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111127205028.708ea59f@endymion.delvare>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 20:50:28 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Jochen Friedrich <jochen@...am.de>,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: convert drivers/i2c/* to use
module_platform_driver()
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 20:46:48 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > > -module_init(gpiomux_init);
> > > -module_exit(gpiomux_exit);
> > > +module_platform_driver(gpiomux_driver);
> >
> > This one would be better as a separate patch, as it touches a different
> > subdirectory, which I am responsible for.
>
> ... which has a patch pending[1], hint ;)
>
> [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/9432
Yes, that's one of the reasons why I think a separate patch would be
more appropriate. It might be difficult to avoid patch collisions
otherwise.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists