linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] introduce: Multistate Switch Class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZSQcdK5ndSThQPRFAvp=sNMNDgBo5S6+H=t+0AYtJhOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 Nov 2011 23:43:39 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, myungjoo.ham@...il.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Lockwood <lockwood@...roid.com>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@...sung.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Kalle Komierowski <karl.komierowski@...ricsson.com>,
	Johan PALSSON <johan.palsson@...ricsson.com>,
	Daniel WILLERUD <daniel.willerud@...ricsson.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] introduce: Multistate Switch Class

Hi MyungJoo, Arnd

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 24 November 2011, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>> For switch ports, which may have different types of cables
>> (USB, TA, HDMI, Analog A/V, and others), we often have seperated device
>> drivers that detect the state changes at the port and device drivers that
>> do something according to the state changes.
>>
>> For example, when MAX8997-MUIC detects a Charger cable insertion, another
>> device driver (such as MAX8903 charger, MAX8997 charger, Charger Manager,
>> or board file) needs to set charger current limit accordingly and when
>> MAX8997-MUIC detects a HDMI cable insertion, multimedia device drivers
>> need to do some operations accordingly.
>>
>> This patchset supports the usage of notifier for passing such information
>> between device drivers.
>>
>> Another issue is that at a single switch port, there might be multiple
>> and heterogeneous cables attached at the same time. Besides, the state
>> (Attached or Detached) of each cable may alter independently.
>>
>> In order to address such issues, Android kernel's "Switch" class seems to
>> be a good basis and we have implemented "Multistate Switch Class" based on
>> it. The "Switch" class code of Android kernel is GPL as well.
>
> How does this relate to the new "pinmux" subsystem that Linus Walleij
> maintains? Would it be useful to integrate your driver into pinmux
> instead of starting a new subsystem?

Looks unrelated to pinmux but very useful.

And the uevent scheme from Arve seems like it's doing the
right thing to me, but see below on relation to <linux/input.h>.

The GPIO part has to be reviewed by Grant though.

Our charger code also needs to
know when the USB cable is inserted, currently we have a simple
cross-call in a header file:
static void ab8500_charger_usb_state_changed(u8 bm_usb_state, u16 mA);

So there is certainly a growing need of subsystems that
need to notify each other about things that are happening,
the need comes naturally from mobile ICs I think, and
I also think they all have one or another custom mechanism
in place already.

But - and now we need Dmitry to check the concepts:

Some use this stuff from <linux/input.h> to talk to userspace
though the input subsystem:

/*
 * Switch events
 */

#define SW_LID                  0x00  /* set = lid shut */
#define SW_TABLET_MODE          0x01  /* set = tablet mode */
#define SW_HEADPHONE_INSERT     0x02  /* set = inserted */
#define SW_RFKILL_ALL           0x03  /* rfkill master switch, type "any"
                                         set = radio enabled */
#define SW_RADIO                SW_RFKILL_ALL   /* deprecated */
#define SW_MICROPHONE_INSERT    0x04  /* set = inserted */
#define SW_DOCK                 0x05  /* set = plugged into dock */
#define SW_LINEOUT_INSERT       0x06  /* set = inserted */
#define SW_JACK_PHYSICAL_INSERT 0x07  /* set = mechanical switch set */
#define SW_VIDEOOUT_INSERT      0x08  /* set = inserted */
#define SW_CAMERA_LENS_COVER    0x09  /* set = lens covered */
#define SW_KEYPAD_SLIDE         0x0a  /* set = keypad slide out */
#define SW_FRONT_PROXIMITY      0x0b  /* set = front proximity sensor active */
#define SW_ROTATE_LOCK          0x0c  /* set = rotate locked/disabled */
#define SW_LINEIN_INSERT        0x0d  /* set = inserted */
#define SW_MAX                  0x0f
#define SW_CNT                  (SW_MAX+1)

These are *also* switches. You could very well add USB
cable insertion to the list above.

So for the userspace part it seems to me that we need to make
up our mind about this stuff: is it going to be through input or
uevent like in this patch? Or ?both??

Incidentally I saw a similar problem the other day, we submitted
a HWMON driver that introduced an kernel-internal event
broadcast system for when the system gets overheated etc,
it serves a similar purpose as MyungJoo's second patch
(the kernel-internal notifications), albeit someplace else.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/