[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ED33EB1.6030200@metafoo.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:56:33 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
drivers@...log.com, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] firmware: Sigma: Skip header during CRC generation
On 11/25/2011 09:00 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 25 November 2011 03:55:42 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 11/24/2011 06:21 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Thursday 24 November 2011 07:48:21 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>>> The firmware header is not part of the CRC, so skip it. Otherwise the
>>>> firmware will be rejected due to non-matching CRCs.
>>>
>>> that's because you didn't compare to the right value ;). include the CRC
>>> -> compare to 0. omit the CRC -> compare to the CRC value.
>>
>> Does this really work if the CRC is inserted somewhere in the middle of the
>> bytestream?
>
> i don't think the position matters to the CRC algorithm used by sigmadsp.
> math principle: a ^ b ^ c is the same thing as b ^ a ^ c and c ^ b ^ a.
If CRC algorithms were commutative they would be pretty weak, I guess ;)
>
> i could be wrong as to the CRC algo used though. simple enough for you to
> check -- i implemented this firmware code based on a spec i wrote up for the
> sigmadsp peeps; i never actually had real firmware to test with.
> -mike
It does not work.
- Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists