linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/62] ata: remove the second argument of k[un]map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ED37541.4040701@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:49:21 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/62] ata: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()

于 2011年11月28日 19:42, Cong Wang 写道:
> 于 2011年11月28日 18:01, Sergei Shtylyov 写道:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 27-11-2011 9:26, Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang<amwang@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/ata/libata-sff.c | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> IMO, you should do this in a single patch, not piecemeal to keep the kernel bisectable.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Please see patch 01/62,
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/28/35
>
> So even without it, the kernel can still compile, just with some warnings.
>

Ah, no, sorry that I replied too quickly. We have to have at least 01/62
to compile.

Actually I did make the patches as a whole, but Andrew Morton prefers to
split them, so I make V2 of them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/