[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111128122416.GA25996@localhost>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:24:16 +0000
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>,
Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>,
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer <ivan@...idor.net>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: btrfs_calc_avail_data_space cope with no
read/write devices V2
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 06:11:06AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>
> > When we mount a btrfs filesystem from read-only media there will be no
> > read/write devices; for example mounting an SD card with its lock enabled.
> > This triggers an immediate BUG during mount:
> >
> > kernel BUG at .../fs/btrfs/super.c:984!
> [...]
> > BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816770
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
> > ---
>
> Fixes http://bugs.debian.org/649847
> Tested-by: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer <ivan@...idor.net>
>
> This patch fixes a regression introduced by 6d07bcec969a ("btrfs: fix
> wrong free space information of btrfs"), which hit mainline in
> v2.6.38-rc1. Josef Bacik acked the patch, but I can't seem to find it
> in linux-next, linux-btrfs, or Josef's btrfs-work tree. Maybe it was
> just forgotten.
>
> What can I do to help this patch get unstuck?
I had completely forgotten about this one. I wonder where it did get
to. I seem to remember testing this in house successfully.
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists