[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322439281.23348.34.camel@pasglop>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:14:41 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
scarybeasts@...il.com, djm@...drot.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
segoon@...nwall.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, kees.cook@...onical.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/13] powerpc: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and
provide seccomp_execve
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:36 -0500, Will Drewry wrote:
> > Facilitate the use of CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER by wrapping compatibility
> > system call numbering for execve and selecting HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER.
> >
> > v9: rebase on to bccaeafd7c117acee36e90d37c7e05c19be9e7bf
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
>
> Seen these around for a while ... :-)
>
> I don't see a harm in the patches per-se tho I haven't reviewed the
> actual seccomp filter stuff and it's good (or bad) behaviour on ppc.
Did that stuff every got anywhere ? I don't see HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER
upsteam ... should I just drop the powerpc patch from patchwork ?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists