[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1322506259-4768-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:50:59 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH] regmap: Report if we actually handled an interrupt in regmap-irq
While the IRQ core doesn't currently support shared threaded interrupts
that's no reason for drivers not to do their bit and report IRQ_NONE when
they don't get an interrupt. This allows the core spurious/wedget interrupt
detection support to do its thing.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
index bd54f63..6b8a74c 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static irqreturn_t regmap_irq_thread(int irq, void *d)
u8 *buf8 = data->status_reg_buf;
u16 *buf16 = data->status_reg_buf;
u32 *buf32 = data->status_reg_buf;
+ bool handled = false;
ret = regmap_bulk_read(map, chip->status_base, data->status_reg_buf,
chip->num_regs);
@@ -146,10 +147,14 @@ static irqreturn_t regmap_irq_thread(int irq, void *d)
if (data->status_buf[chip->irqs[i].reg_offset] &
chip->irqs[i].mask) {
handle_nested_irq(data->irq_base + i);
+ handled = true;
}
}
- return IRQ_HANDLED;
+ if (handled)
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+ else
+ return IRQ_NONE;
}
/**
--
1.7.7.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists