[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP36987CC5BAE13BD585AA31198B20@phx.gbl>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:05:15 +0000
From: wilsonjonathan <piercing_male@...mail.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linear raid, is partial recovery possible?
Please ignore as sent to wrong list.
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 18:53 +0000, wilsonjonathan wrote:
> Quick question regarding linear raid.
>
> If a disk fails on a linear raid I understand how the raid is
> non-recoverable, as a whole, as it has lost a chunk of data.
>
> However is it possible to recover the data from the non-failed portion
> of the raid as I assume linear works by starting at one end of the array
> and slowly progresses to the other?
>
> Or perhaps it is dependent on the file system on the array, eg. ext
> works by trying to place files distant to each other to help reduce the
> possibility of fragmentation?
>
> Perhaps the filesystem meta data, or some portion, may span between two
> physical drives which would corrupt its table?
>
> And obviously if a file spans two disks it would be missing part of its
> data?
>
> Does the raid underlying a file system do its own things, re-space,
> physical data layout, etc; or does/can a file system impact on the
> workings of an array?
>
> The more I look into software raid the more fasinated I become with it
> and its inner workings. While its way beyond me in some of the maths and
> the fact I am un-proficient in C it has really caught my intrigue, and
> all because I wanted to set up a small home server ;-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists