[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322511002.2921.171.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:10:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com,
paulus@...ba.org, acme@...stprotocols.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] ftrace, perf: Add support to use function
tracepoint in perf
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 21:08 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Is it really an issue that we shouldn't call the full blown register
> > instead? I'm not really understanding why this is a problem. Note, one
> > of the improvements to ftrace in the near future is to enable ftrace
> > without stop_machine.
>
> Yeah, but still not something you want to do during context switches,
> right?
Also, that's x86, there's still archs that need stop_machine(), right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists