linux-kernel - [PATCH] genirq: fix second 2.6.39 regression in irqfixup, irqpoll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111128040734.GA3590@Brahman>
Date:	Sun, 27 Nov 2011 23:07:34 -0500
From:	Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@...ble.net>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	drivers_pci@...nel-bugs.osdl.org,
	Rogério Brito <rbrito@....usp.br>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: fix second 2.6.39 regression in irqfixup, irqpoll

commit fa27271bc8d2("genirq: Fixup poll handling") introduced a
regression that broke irqfixup/irqpoll for some hardware
configurations.  Amidst reorganizing 'try_one_irq', that patch removed
a test that checked for 'action->handler' returning IRQ_HANDLED,
before acting on the interrupt.  Restoring this test back returns the
functionality lost since 2.6.39.  In the current set of tests, after
'action' is set, it must precede '!action->next' to take effect.

With this and my previous patch to irq/spurious.c, c75d720fca8a, all
IRQ regressions that I have encountered are fixed.

Signed-off-by: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@...ble.net>
---
 kernel/irq/spurious.c |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index b5f4742..dc813a9 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ static int try_one_irq(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, bool force)
 	 */
 	action = desc->action;
 	if (!action || !(action->flags & IRQF_SHARED) ||
-	    (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) || !action->next)
+	    (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) ||
+	    (action->handler(irq, action->dev_id) == IRQ_HANDLED) ||
+	    !action->next)
 		goto out;
 
 	/* Already running on another processor */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/