linux-kernel - Re: [V2 PATCH 00/62] highmem: remove the second argument of kmap_atomic/kunmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ED33B61.8040808@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:42:25 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 00/62] highmem: remove the second argument of kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic

于 2011年11月28日 06:21, Benjamin Herrenschmidt 写道:
> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 13:26 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>> V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/30/13
>>
>> V1->V2: Split patches and rebase them to the latest linus tree.
>
> I'm not too fan of the split myself... 62 patches is just plain crazy.
> However, no obvious objection from the patches themselves (at least the
> ones affecting powerpc), though I haven't had a chance to test them yet.

Actually Andrew Morton prefers to have patches split, also, splitting
patches helps review. ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/