lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111129091012.20730.83741.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:10:12 +0300
From:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To:	Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
Cc:	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...allels.com, neilb@...e.de,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jbottomley@...allels.com, bfields@...ldses.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] NFS: handle blocklayout pipe PipeFS dentry by network
	namespace aware routines

This patch makes blocklayout pipe dentry allocated and destroyed in network
namespace context by PipeFS network namespace aware routines.
Network namespace context is obtained from nfs_client structure.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>

---
 fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c |   60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
index c26633e..50d5183 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
@@ -965,10 +965,55 @@ static const struct rpc_pipe_ops bl_upcall_ops = {
 	.destroy_msg	= bl_pipe_destroy_msg,
 };
 
+static struct dentry *nfs4blocklayout_register_sb(struct super_block *sb,
+					    struct rpc_pipe *pipe)
+{
+	struct dentry *dir, *dentry;
+
+	dir = rpc_d_lookup_sb(sb, NFS_PIPE_DIRNAME);
+	if (dir == NULL)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+	dentry = rpc_mkpipe_dentry(dir, "blocklayout", NULL, pipe);
+	dput(dir);
+	return dentry;
+}
+
+static void nfs4blocklayout_unregister_sb(struct super_block *sb,
+					  struct rpc_pipe *pipe)
+{
+	if (pipe->dentry)
+		rpc_unlink(pipe->dentry);
+}
+
+static struct dentry *nfs4blocklayout_register_net(struct net *net,
+						   struct rpc_pipe *pipe)
+{
+	struct super_block *pipefs_sb;
+	struct dentry *dentry;
+
+	pipefs_sb = rpc_get_sb_net(net);
+	if (!pipefs_sb)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+	dentry = nfs4blocklayout_register_sb(pipefs_sb, pipe);
+	rpc_put_sb_net(net);
+	return dentry;
+}
+
+static void nfs4blocklayout_unregister_net(struct net *net,
+					   struct rpc_pipe *pipe)
+{
+	struct super_block *pipefs_sb;
+
+	pipefs_sb = rpc_get_sb_net(net);
+	if (pipefs_sb) {
+		nfs4blocklayout_unregister_sb(pipefs_sb, pipe);
+		rpc_put_sb_net(net);
+	}
+}
+
 static int __init nfs4blocklayout_init(void)
 {
 	struct vfsmount *mnt;
-	struct path path;
 	int ret;
 
 	dprintk("%s: NFSv4 Block Layout Driver Registering...\n", __func__);
@@ -984,20 +1029,13 @@ static int __init nfs4blocklayout_init(void)
 		ret = PTR_ERR(mnt);
 		goto out_remove;
 	}
-
-	ret = vfs_path_lookup(mnt->mnt_root,
-			      mnt,
-			      NFS_PIPE_DIRNAME, 0, &path);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out_remove;
-
 	bl_device_pipe = rpc_mkpipe_data(&bl_upcall_ops, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(bl_device_pipe)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(bl_device_pipe);
 		goto out_remove;
 	}
-	bl_device_pipe->dentry = rpc_mkpipe_dentry(path.dentry, "blocklayout",
-						   NULL, bl_device_pipe);
+	bl_device_pipe->dentry = nfs4blocklayout_register_net(&init_net,
+							      bl_device_pipe);
 	if (IS_ERR(bl_device_pipe->dentry)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(bl_device_pipe->dentry);
 		goto out_destroy_pipe;
@@ -1018,7 +1056,7 @@ static void __exit nfs4blocklayout_exit(void)
 	       __func__);
 
 	pnfs_unregister_layoutdriver(&blocklayout_type);
-	rpc_unlink(bl_device_pipe->dentry);
+	nfs4blocklayout_unregister_net(&init_net, bl_device_pipe);
 	rpc_destroy_pipe_data(bl_device_pipe);
 }
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ