[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111129120807.GM23376@infomag.iguana.be>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:08:07 +0100
From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Vertes <marc.vertes@...fox.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Dimitry Andric <dimitry.andric@...tom.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben@...tec.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add nowayout helpers to Watchdog Timer
Driver Kernel API
Hi Wolfram,
> > diff --git a/Documentation/watchdog/00-INDEX b/Documentation/watchdog/00-INDEX
> > index fc51128..fc9082a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/watchdog/00-INDEX
> > +++ b/Documentation/watchdog/00-INDEX
> > @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> > 00-INDEX
> > - this file.
> > +convert_drivers_to_kernel_api.txt
> > + - how-to for converting old watchdog drivers to the new kernel API.
>
> Since the howto needs a NOWAYOUT-update as well, I suggest I'll send a
> patch for that and take care of the missing index-entry there?
Ok.
> > @@ -142,6 +142,14 @@ bit-operations. The status bits that are defined are:
> > * WDOG_NO_WAY_OUT: this bit stores the nowayout setting for the watchdog.
> > If this bit is set then the watchdog timer will not be able to stop.
> >
> > +To set the WDOG_NO_WAY_OUT status bit (before registering your watchdog
> > +timer device) you can either:
> > +* set it statically in your watchdog_device struct with
> > + .status = WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT_INIT_STATUS,
> > + (this will set the value the same as CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT) or
> > +* use the following helper function:
> > +static inline void watchdog_set_nowayout(struct watchdog_device *wdd, int nowayout)
> > +
>
> I think one level of indentation would be helpful here so it visually
> belongs to the WDOG_NO_WAY_OUT paragraph?
Will fix that.
> > +/* Use the following function to set the nowayout feature */
> > +static inline void watchdog_set_nowayout(struct watchdog_device *wdd, int nowayout)
> > +{
> > + if (nowayout)
> > + set_bit(WDOG_NO_WAY_OUT, &wdd->status);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Other than that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
>
> So, shall I fix the s3c-driver based on that or will you do?
Will included the fix in the final patch.
Kind regards,
Wim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists