[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ED4CDCE.9080804@parallels.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:19:26 +0400
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To: "tao.peng@....com" <tao.peng@....com>
CC: "Trond.Myklebust@...app.com" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
"bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference from
blocklayout routines
29.11.2011 16:00, tao.peng@....com пишет:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-nfs-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-nfs-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Stanislav
>> Kinsbursky
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 6:11 PM
>> To: Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
>> Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org; xemul@...allels.com; neilb@...e.de; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; jbottomley@...allels.com; bfields@...ldses.org; davem@...emloft.net;
>> devel@...nvz.org
>> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference from blocklayout routines
>>
>> This is a cleanup patch. We don't need this reference anymore, because
>> blocklayout pipes dentries now creates and destroys in per-net operations and
>> on PipeFS mount/umount notification.
>> Note that nfs4blocklayout_register_net() now returns 0 instead of -ENOENT in
>> case of PipeFS superblock absence. This is ok, because blocklayout pipe dentry
>> will be created on PipeFS mount event.
> When is the "pipefs mount event" going to happen? When inserting kernel modules or when user issues mount command?
>
When user issues mount command.
Kernel mounts of PipeFS has been removed with all these patch sets I've sent
already.
> Thanks,
> Tao
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@...allels.com>
>>
>> ---
>> fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c | 9 +--------
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
>> index acf7ac9..8211ffd 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
>> @@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static struct dentry *nfs4blocklayout_register_net(struct net *net,
>>
>> pipefs_sb = rpc_get_sb_net(net);
>> if (!pipefs_sb)
>> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>> + return 0;
>> dentry = nfs4blocklayout_register_sb(pipefs_sb, pipe);
>> rpc_put_sb_net(net);
>> return dentry;
>> @@ -1083,7 +1083,6 @@ static struct pernet_operations nfs4blocklayout_net_ops = {
>>
>> static int __init nfs4blocklayout_init(void)
>> {
>> - struct vfsmount *mnt;
>> int ret;
>>
>> dprintk("%s: NFSv4 Block Layout Driver Registering...\n", __func__);
>> @@ -1093,12 +1092,6 @@ static int __init nfs4blocklayout_init(void)
>> goto out;
>>
>> init_waitqueue_head(&bl_wq);
>> -
>> - mnt = rpc_get_mount();
>> - if (IS_ERR(mnt)) {
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(mnt);
>> - goto out_remove;
>> - }
>> ret = rpc_pipefs_notifier_register(&nfs4blocklayout_block);
>> if (ret)
>> goto out_remove;
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists